<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Me Blog! &#187; thought provoking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertsweetnam.ie/tag/thought-provoking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertsweetnam.ie</link>
	<description>It&#039;s hard to think of a tagline - All the good ones are taken..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:00:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Synergy</title>
		<link>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/12/18/synergy/</link>
		<comments>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/12/18/synergy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curiosities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obvious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiffy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huh?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought provoking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sweetnam.eu/?p=947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Merriam Webster dictionary defines synergy as &#8220;a mutually advantageous conjunction or compatibility of distinct business participants or elements (as resources or efforts)&#8221; Anyone with any experience in a workplace will know it as a management buzzword that smacks of horseshit. When asked to define what synergy is you would invariably get the reply &#8220;1 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Easy AdSense V2.82 -->
<!-- Post[count: 2] -->
<div class="ezAdsense adsense adsense-leadin" style="text-align:center;margin:12px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-6763366335965000";
/* 468x60, created 9/3/08 */
google_ad_slot = "1846913107";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><p>The Merriam Webster dictionary defines synergy as <em>&#8220;a mutually advantageous conjunction or compatibility of distinct business participants or elements (as resources or efforts)&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Anyone with any experience in a workplace will know it as a management buzzword that smacks of horseshit. When asked to define what synergy is you would invariably get the reply &#8220;1 + 1 = 3&#8243;</p>
<p>Not very helpful is it?</p>
<p>Synergy always annoyed me probably because like most people I didn&#8217;t understand or want to know the concept but it hit me like a ton of bricks over in the pub last night. Let me explain:</p>
<p>As it&#8217;s near christmas time, drink flows freely and occassionally a sing song might start up. Well last night one of three brothers started a song. When he was finished the second brother sang a song. This put the third brother under a bit of pressure to sing a song so he felt he has no choice so he eventually sang a song too.</p>
<p>There you go, Synergy!</p>
<p>1 brother singing + 1 brother singing = 3 brothers singing. 1 + 1 =3!</p>
<p>Now how to apply that to the business world without resorting to blackmail is anyones guess.</p>
<p><img src="http://robertsweetnam.ie/?voyeur=1"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/12/18/synergy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another postal lottery scam</title>
		<link>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/04/06/another-postal-lottery-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/04/06/another-postal-lottery-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[419]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer beware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no money back guarantee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not in you can't win]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought provoking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sweetnam.eu/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t received a 419 in the post for a while and I was just thinking as much the other day. Lo and behold as if my mind was being read at that time I got one this morning. It&#8217;s another lottery scam this time from Germany. From &#8220;State Lottery Agent BOESCHE&#8221; to be exact. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t received a 419 in the post for a while and I was just thinking as much the other day. Lo and behold as if my mind was being read at that time I got one this morning.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s another lottery scam this time from Germany. From &#8220;State Lottery Agent BOESCHE&#8221; to be exact. It arrived by air mail and has a pre-paid air mail envelope included with which to send your &#8220;entry&#8221; back.</p>
<p>Included is the usual literature one would expect. Cover letter, participation certificate, glossy flyer etc.</p>
<p>What makes this one interesting is that the lottery itself is genuine it&#8217;s just that BOESCHE are agents and promise to enter you into the draw for a fee of course.</p>
<p>The fees in question range from €40 to €62.50. Also worth noting is those fees are per month so if you happen to send off your credit card number you can expect to be fleeced each each month.</p>
<p>As is usual with these things, while they provide you with ample payment methods to part with your cash, there are absolutely no terms and conditions attached. None, zip, nada. The only stipulation of any kind is a small subtext requiring your date of birth as &#8220;you are not allowed to enter until the age of 18&#8243;</p>
<p>If there is no small print then there is no guarantee that of your winnings or no guarantee that your credit card will not  be maxed out either.</p>
<p>It is worth nothing what the <a title="New Zealand Ministry of Consumer affairs" href="http://www.consumeraffairs.govt.nz/scamwatch/prizelottery.html" target="_blank">New Zealand Ministry of Consumer Affairs</a> have to say about these lottery propositions so I will quote what they have to say here:</p>
<blockquote><p>There are several operators, mainly from European countries, that              appear to offer New Zealand consumers the opportunity to purchase              tickets in legitimate lotteries run in the United Kingdom, Germany              and Canada, for example. These operators ask consumers to send funds              in advance (or credit card information) which will be used by the              operator to purchase tickets in these lotteries. Consumers usually              don&#8217;t receive the tickets but instead receive statements providing              information about the prize draw and any &#8220;winnings&#8221;.</p>
<p>The concerns are:</p>
<ul>
<li>that the ticket prices are far higher than face value of the                actual lottery ticket price,</li>
<li>information from the operator may not state you become part of                a syndicate (or the size of that syndicate)</li>
<li>the consumer has no information on whether the funds they are                sending are applied to purchasing tickets, or</li>
<li>the consumer has no information that the small &#8220;winnings&#8221; they                may receive from time to time are from actual prize payouts and                not from other consumers ticket purchase funds.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Beware! If you get one just throw it in the bin.</p>
<p><img src="http://robertsweetnam.ie/?voyeur=1"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/04/06/another-postal-lottery-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Formula One coverage &#8211; My thoughts</title>
		<link>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/04/05/bbc-formula-one-coverage-my-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/04/05/bbc-formula-one-coverage-my-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Formula 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obvious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought provoking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sweetnam.eu/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overall I&#8217;m pleased! That Leggard fella is terrible! Who is he anyway? And why is does he insist on cutting Martin Brundle off at any given opportunity? The tall lad presenting with Coulthard and Jordan is quite good. Excellent ad-lib abilities. Everytime the tall lad says &#8220;OK&#8221; I stand up and head to the kitchen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Overall I&#8217;m pleased!</li>
<li>That Leggard fella is terrible! Who is he anyway? And why is does he insist on cutting Martin Brundle off at any given opportunity?</li>
<li>The tall lad presenting with Coulthard and Jordan is quite good. Excellent ad-lib abilities.</li>
<li>Everytime the tall lad says &#8220;OK&#8221; I stand up and head to the kitchen to boil the kettle because I think an ad break is on the way.</li>
<li>BBC&#8217;s computer game style intro is pants.</li>
<li>The Chain by Fleetwood Mac brings back absolutely wonderful memories of sitting watching a race with my father many, many years ago. (Monaco &#8217;86 immediately springs to mind and the Parmalat sponsored Brabhams.)</li>
<li>David Coulthard is wonderfully informative.</li>
<li>Eddie Jordan is not.</li>
<li>Stefano Domenicali of Ferrari has a mighty sense of humour. (Claiming they deliberately set fire to Raikkonnen&#8217;s KERS system to wake him up!)</li>
<li>Who the hell is this Leggard fella? He&#8217;s still talking and not making much sense?</li>
<li>There&#8217;s some fella called something Leggard who keeps talking over Martin Brundle and he hasn&#8217;t a clue what he is on about.</li>
<li>Lee McKenzie is totally underused, her accent is gorgeous!</li>
</ul>
<p>And finally, and I never thought I would say this:</p>
<ul>
<li>Where is James Allen? Come back! All is forgiven!</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://robertsweetnam.ie/?voyeur=1"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/04/05/bbc-formula-one-coverage-my-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A letter to our leaders who seem hell bent on destroying us</title>
		<link>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/02/20/a-letter-to-our-leaders-who-seem-hell-bent-on-destroying-us/</link>
		<comments>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/02/20/a-letter-to-our-leaders-who-seem-hell-bent-on-destroying-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obvious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sadness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disgrace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lauging stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought provoking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sweetnam.eu/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be warned &#8211; This post contains some strong language. Anglo Irish Bank&#8217;s annual report released today states that it loaned €451m to 10 clients that are now more commonly referred to as &#8220;The Golden 10&#8243;. As anyone can tell you, 450 million is a significantally more than the previous estimate of €300m. And here is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be warned &#8211; This post contains some strong language.</p>
<p>Anglo Irish Bank&#8217;s annual report released today states that it loaned €451m  to 10 clients that are now more commonly referred to as &#8220;The Golden 10&#8243;. As  anyone can tell you, 450 million is a significantally more than the previous  estimate of €300m.</p>
<p>And here is the kicker &#8211; €83m has been repaid and the bank are expecting to  <a title="The Irish Times" href="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/0220/breaking14.htm" target="_blank">strike  out the rest</a> of the debt. 300 million gone just like that! 10 people who owe  money to a bank that the people of Ireland now effectively own don&#8217;t have to pay  any of it back and the Minister of Finance refuses to name them!</p>
<p>If one of us owed a red fucking penny to the revenue commissioners our names  would be in the tax defaulters list of every national newspaper!</p>
<p>That stupid ignoramus from Co. Offlay claims it is in the national  interests as the debtors are shareholders. Well if they are shareholders in the bank  and they owe it so much money and won&#8217;t be paying it back <em>take the fucking  shares off them</em>! And Mary Coughlan, when you said yesterday that it &#8220;would  damage confidence in Irish banks&#8221; you can just fuck off back to Donegal and  crawl back under the rock you crawled from. Are you actually that thick fucking  stupid that you think that there already hasn&#8217;t been a serious loss of  confidence in Irish banks?</p>
<p>That statement alone from Coughlan instantly proves you; Fianna Fail haven&#8217;t  one iota of what is actually happening to the country. You seem to be so  preoccupied with balance sheets and our standing in the international community  that you seem to have forgotten about us. The ordinary people. The ordinary  people that are losing their homes their jobs and the ordinary people who are  ending up in prison because they can&#8217;t <a title="The Irish Examiner" href="http://www.examiner.ie/ireland/ideysnmhey/" target="_blank">pay their television  license</a>.</p>
<p>Well, Brian Cowen, Mary Coughlan and the two <a title="Tossers" href="http://blog.sweetnam.eu/2008/01/22/the-death-of-the-green-party-in-ireland/" target="_blank">idiotic green party lapdogs</a> of yours.  Let me give you a sound piece of advice.</p>
<p>Fuck the international community. At least until you get your own house in  order because that is exactly what other countries are doing. They have their  own problems too you know and they really couldn&#8217;t care about us at the moment.  Or anyone else but themselves for that matter. And this is probably the right  thing to do. We can all kiss and make up when this all blows over in a few years when we are all learning to walk again. And anyway what have you got to lose at this stage?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a poisoned chalice but drink from it you fuckers. Drink long and hard and deep for the sake of those of us who have to live in the mess that you have created. Take it on the chin and get us out of it. And if that means calling a general election and losing control of government just do it anyway for all of our sakes.</p>
<p>We want someone to get us through this and time and time again you have proven that you are not the right people for the job.</p>
<p><strong>Edit &#8211; Just to put things into perspective, €300m being written off the books is the the exact same as 1200 homeowners with a mortgage of €250,000.</strong></p>
<p>So who is fooling who?<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://robertsweetnam.ie/?voyeur=1"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/02/20/a-letter-to-our-leaders-who-seem-hell-bent-on-destroying-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting &#8220;New Media&#8221; Right</title>
		<link>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/02/11/getting-new-media-right/</link>
		<comments>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/02/11/getting-new-media-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought provoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worth it]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sweetnam.eu/?p=644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tired of looking at blurry images on the T.V?  Trying to get a good look at a picture that makes up the dots on a printed paper? And fed up at tiny little images on the online edition? Have a look at this: http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/02/bushfires_in_victoria_australi.html They have an RSS feed for their Big Picture series and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tired of looking at blurry images on the T.V?  Trying to get a good look at a picture that makes up the dots on a printed paper? And fed up at tiny little images on the online edition?</p>
<p>Have a look at this:</p>
<p><a title="Boston.com" href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/02/bushfires_in_victoria_australi.html" target="_blank">http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/02/bushfires_in_victoria_australi.html</a></p>
<p>They have an RSS feed for their Big Picture series and it is well worth subscribing to.</p>
<p>Time and time again the photos they pick are utterly incredible. Not least of all because they are of a decent resolution and of amazing quality but they are extremely thought provoking. They seem to provide the missing link for where the printed media meets the internet. (Despite that fact that  the images are often from the same sources) However their Big Picture series always takes the form of a photo essay, which I reckon is the feature&#8217;s strongest point: Pictures can speak more than words.</p>
<p>The series linked to above are of the recent bush fires in Australia and pictures really do speak more than words in this case. And certainly speak more than any 226px × 180px image that doesn&#8217;t link to a more detailed picture can. Or for that matter a 102px × 130px picture that links to nothing on a site that is optimised for a resolution of 640 x 480 ever can.</p>
<p><img src="http://robertsweetnam.ie/?voyeur=1"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robertsweetnam.ie/2009/02/11/getting-new-media-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

